U.S. District Court – Eastern
The court lacked personal jurisdiction over the defendant, a Japanese financial institution. The bank previously did business with a now-defunct company that claimed to be “the world’s most established bitcoin exchange,” wiring cash to the company’s users at their request. The plaintiff claimed that, when the bank cut ties with the bitcoin exchange, it tortiously interfered in his relationship with the company. But the bank was located at all times in Japan and conducted no activities in Virginia; all contacts with Virginians were initiated by the latter.
Motion to dismiss granted.
Virginia Circuit Courts
A contract provision for a parent to pay attorneys’ fees and costs in any litigation with her child’s school, even if she prevailed, was unenforceable as unconscionable and against public policy.
Categories: Daily Dockets